The Sydney Swans have renewed calls for the SCG to break with more than 140 years of tradition and install a drop-in pitch amid growing frustration at the quality of the tracks at the famous venue.
In a continuation of the turf war between the commercial might of the AFL and the traditionalists in cricket, Swans chairman Andrew Pridham said the SCG needed to move with the times and dig up the hallowed centre wicket and become an all-purpose venue.
Cricket has been resolute in protecting the turf, but there has been a softening of opinion in some quarters of the game, with Cricket NSW board member and former Test opener Ed Cowan saying the SCG should at least consider a drop-in pitch to improve the standard of pitches at the stadium.
Defenders of the traditional SCG pitch have pointed to concerns over the quality of drop-ins as a major reason to resist the change. But the Swans’ latest push comes as the MCG’s drop-in, once considered the worst Test strip in the country, is now rated the nation’s best Test pitch on the back of consecutive top marks for its Boxing Day track. Perth’s Optus Stadium also received the highest grade of “very good” this season for its moveable pitch.
“I see no correlation between a bad wicket and a drop-in wicket,” Pridham told this masthead. “If you’ve got drop-in wickets, I suspect the reality is you’ll have a better product.
“I don’t see the argument, it’s just stubbornness. It’s a fear of change, unwillingness to move with the times. We’re the major tenant of the SCG. We’re playing a lot of games there, training there, it should be a drop-in wicket. Full stop.”
Swans players have long held concerns over how slippery the centre square becomes when wet, and the different way the ball bounces on the pitch table compared to the lusher grass elsewhere.
While the SCG received a rating of “satisfactory” for this season’s Test strip – the second highest grading in the International Cricket Council’s four-tier system – the venue has been criticised for its decks.
Former Test captain Tim Paine described the pitch for a Sheffield Shield game between NSW and Tasmania as an “absolute disgrace” after 24 wickets fell on the final day. Australia batter Matt Short raised eyebrows with comments he made in a mid-game interview, expressing surprise at the dry and patchy track used for last Sunday’s one-day international against the West Indies.
But Test batter Usman Khawaja, who debuted for NSW in 2008, said this year’s Test pitch was a return to the SCG’s former glory.
Cowan said the couch grass being used at the SCG was not conducive to producing good cricket pitches, unlike the legend couch used previously, which was ideal for cricket but lost colour in winter.
“It [the grass now] basically doesn’t work, so they’re in a situation now of balancing the needs of the SCG,” Cowan said on the ABC’s Grandstand Cricket Podcast.
“They need to go back, or they need to dig it up or go to the drop-ins because in my view what is currently in place and the strategy around the turf at the SCG is not appropriate.
“We’ve had a phenomenal summer in Sydney for growing grass. Something needs to happen. I don’t know what it is. Someone needs to be accountable.”
Cricket NSW chairman John Knox said the state association wanted whatever system would produce the best quality pitch. His statement to this masthead is a shift from CEO Lee Germon’s steadfast opposition in a 2019 submission to an SCG Trust drop-in pitch committee due to fears they would produce “boring” cricket.
“Cricket NSW wants the best possible cricket pitch at the SCG to allow the best players in the world to demonstrate their skill, while providing enormous entertainment to all fans, most importantly inspiring the young girls and boys watching at the ground and on television to play and love cricket, hopefully one day emulating their heroes,” Knox said.
“The debate around a drop-in pitch is irrelevant anyway, as it is our understanding that drop-in pitches require significant access and infrastructure that is not currently available at the SCG.”
Pridham said it was “rubbish” the SCG could not accommodate the sizeable trays needed to move the drop-in pitches.
“They can land a man on the moon in 1969, they can certainly get a drop-in wicket onto thee SCG in 2024,” Pridham said.
“They can do it in pieces. It’s purely politics between Cricket NSW and the SCG it hasn’t happened. The arguments about technological barriers are not substantiated.
“The only cogent argument I’ve heard against it is cost. It will cost more, but let’s focus on the truth rather than coming up with false reasons.”
In a cheeky jab, Cricket NSW disputed Pridham’s assertion the AFL club was the SCG’s major tenant, pointing out that cricket fans spent more time at the ground, even though the Swans drew more people through the gates for their 11 games last year than cricket did for its Tests, ODI and Big Bash games this summer.
“Cricket is the most important sport played at the SCG. This season almost 300,000 spectators spent over 1.2 million hours at the ground watching elite cricket – over 50 per cent more hours than any other sport,” Knox said.
Venues NSW, the body which operates the SCG, declined to comment.
News, results and expert analysis from the weekend of sport sent every Monday. Sign up for our Sport newsletter.