The NRL is currently embroiled in a heated debate over the Sydney Roosters’ attempt to sign teenage player Joseph Suaalii. The 17-year-old is considered one of the most talented players in the game and has been courted by several clubs, but the Roosters have been the most aggressive in their pursuit.
The move has sparked a fierce debate between NRL greats, with some arguing that the Roosters are taking advantage of Suaalii’s age and inexperience, while others believe that the club is simply doing what is necessary to stay competitive in the league.
On one side of the debate, former Roosters player and coach Brad Fittler believes that the club should be allowed to sign Suaalii, arguing that the teen is a special talent who should be given the opportunity to play at the highest level. Fittler believes that the Roosters should be allowed to sign Suaalii and that the NRL should not be making decisions on behalf of players.
On the other side of the debate, former Roosters player and coach Phil Gould believes that the club should not be signing Suaalii, arguing that it is unfair to put such a young player in a position of such responsibility. Gould believes that the Roosters should be focusing on developing their current players, rather than signing a player who may not be ready for the rigours of professional rugby league.
The NRL has yet to make a decision on the matter, but it is clear that there are strong opinions on both sides of the debate. While some believe that Suaalii should be given the opportunity to play at the highest level, others argue that it would be unfair to put such a young player in such a position. Ultimately, it will be up to the NRL to decide whether or not to allow the Roosters to sign Suaalii. Whatever their decision, it is sure to spark further debate among NRL greats.
