The armband wars are escalating.
On Wednesday, the German national team mounted its own mute protest of FIFA’s OneLove armband ban and threatened to take the matter to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, and Denmark said it would not support the re-election of Gianni Infantino as president and mooted the possibility of resigning from FIFA altogether.
Meantime, Socceroos activist Jackson Irvine gave the armband a different twist. Irvine, who was the most prominent player in a video clip released by the Australian team pre-tournament protesting against Qatar’s human rights record and its criminalisation of gay sex, said that in the whirl of player action and FIFA reaction in Qatar, the original message had become blurred and lost.
This was in the context of a FIFA threat to issue England and other European teams with yellow cards if they wore the armbands, causing them to baulk at the eleventh hour, and a gesture by the German team to form up before their shock loss to Japan with their hands over their mouths to dissent FIFA’s clampdown on captain Manuel Neuer, who had intended to wear the OneLove armband.
Neuer had pledged to pay the fine himself if one was levied. His alternative stance on Wednesday was to tuck his official FIFA captain’s armband away under his long sleeves, where it was barely visible. In the stands, the German Federal Minister of the Interior and Community, Nancy Faeser, wore a OneLove armband prominently on a bare arm.
“With our captain’s armband, we wanted to set an example for values that we live in the national team: diversity and mutual respect,” the German players said in a statement. “Be loud together with other nations. This is not a political message: human rights are non-negotiable.
“That should go without saying. Unfortunately, it still isn’t. That is why this message is so important to us. Banning the bandage is like banning our mouths. Our position stands.”
Jackson said that the focus had moved from the armband, which as symbols go is innocuous, featuring neither rainbow colours nor a slogan, to the politics around it. Meantime, football and advocacy had overlapped.
“In the conversations I’ve had with people from the LGBTI community, they have described the messaging as vague, lacking a real kind of statement of what it’s trying to achieve,” Irvine said.
“There will be a time to dissect how those messages have gone out and the way they chose to do it. All I can say is I’m proud of our squad and the clear position we took coming into this tournament.
“There was no possibility of having that (last-minute regulation changes) thrown at us at a late stage. That’s why we chose what we did and the timing of it.
“It’s a tough one to try and deal with while you’re focusing on performance and playing for your country.”
Irvine said the Socceroos’ stance had concentrated on Qatar because that was where they were and where the eyes of the world were now fixed. Next year, Australia and New Zealand host the women’s FIFA World Cup and Irvine acknowledged that it would be hypocritical to stay silent then.
“This has been a journey for the national players to making the statement we made,” he said. “I hope it’s something that as a team we continue to talk about.
“The issues we talk about here, as players and part of this tournament, are intrinsically linked to this time. I hope that’s something we continue to explore in the future as part of our growth as a team and individuals.”
Federal Sports Minister Anika Wells, who is in Doha to support the Socceroos and for a series of meetings with the Qatari government, supported the principle of player agency.
“I back athletes’ right to have a voice,” she said. “I think athletes have every right to speak on issues that are important to them. Athletes are not just chess pieces on a chessboard, they are people with rights. I think Australian sports should be modern Australian workplaces.”
She rejected as hackneyed the tenet that sport and politics should be kept separate.
“Sport is every bit as political as politics,” she said. “The people who try to keep politics out of sport are the ones who currently have the power and want to keep that power.”
Wells said it was important for the Australian government to engage with rather than shun Qatar. “We’re a new government, and we believe in open dialogue, and we believe you need to show up to have it,” she said.
“I think they’re keen to gauge where the Australian government is at. I was quite surprised by how humble, honest and constructive they were about it. They’d like to see more acknowledgement of the work they have done recently [concerning working conditions and labourers’ rights].
“I conveyed to them what has been made very clear to me in Australia that Australians want to see more done and that this work is never over.
“I put that in the broader context that that is the case for all of us. We could all do more to advance human rights, and that this global scrutiny will turn itself upon us in July next year.”
Meantime, FIFA president Gianni Infantino remains under public pressure after a rambling and extraordinary pre-tournament speech defending Qatar’s human rights record as a work in progress. Denmark is leading the backlash, foreshadowing a vote against him in elections next year.
Football Australia chief executive James Johnson, a former FIFA executive, said he didn’t think it would come to that. “We’re not in a position right now to decide that because we don’t have to,” Johnson said. “At this stage, it’s my understanding that only president Infantino will run. I’m not sure there’ll be a decision to make.”
And then there’s the non-political football, the one that Australia needs to get into Tunisia’s net and keep out of its own on Saturday if they are to have any chance of squeaking out of the group stage of this World Cup.
Irvine said that in a way, the maths were the same as before Tuesday’s emphatic defeat by France.
“Of course, the stakes are higher now,” he said, “but at the end of the day, coming into this tournament, you know you’re going to have to get two positive results to progress, and we’ve still got full belief that’s achievable.”