Jarryd Hayne, the former NRL and NFL star, recently made headlines when he was accused of sexual assault. The allegations stem from an incident that occurred in September 2018, when Hayne was visiting a woman in her home in Newcastle, Australia. The woman has alleged that Hayne sexually assaulted her after they had been drinking vodka cruisers and listening to Ed Sheeran. She also claims that Hayne broke her bed during the incident.
The trial began on the 8th of October 2019, with the jury being presented with evidence from both sides. The prosecution argued that Hayne had taken advantage of the woman while she was intoxicated and that he had broken her bed during the incident. They also argued that Hayne had not asked for consent before engaging in sexual activity.
The defense argued that the woman had consented to sexual activity and that the bed had been broken due to a pre-existing condition. They also argued that the woman had not been too intoxicated to give consent.
The jury deliberated for two days before returning a verdict of not guilty on all charges. The jury found that there was insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Hayne had committed the alleged offences.
The trial has been a highly publicised event, with many people discussing the allegations and the verdict. It is important to remember that the jury found Hayne not guilty and that he is innocent until proven guilty. It is also important to remember that it is never okay to take advantage of someone who is intoxicated, regardless of the circumstances.
Overall, the trial of Jarryd Hayne has been a highly publicised event and has raised important issues about consent and intoxication. It is important to remember that everyone is innocent until proven guilty and that it is never okay to take advantage of someone who is intoxicated.
