The 2019 AFL Grand Final ended in controversy, with the result dividing the football world. The match between Richmond and Greater Western Sydney saw a dramatic finish, with the Tigers winning by just four points. However, the result was overshadowed by a contentious decision by the umpires which ultimately decided the game.
The incident in question occurred in the final minutes of the match. Richmond’s Jack Riewoldt was awarded a free kick for a high tackle, despite replays showing that the tackle was low. The decision was highly controversial, with many commentators and fans arguing that it was incorrect.
The decision sparked debate across the football world, with some arguing that the umpires had made the right call, while others argued that it had been a mistake. The debate was further fuelled by the fact that the decision had a direct impact on the result of the match, with the free kick resulting in a goal for Richmond which ultimately decided the game.
The controversy has raised questions about the role of umpires in deciding matches. Many have argued that umpires should be held to a higher standard, and that mistakes such as this should not be allowed to decide games. Others have argued that mistakes are inevitable in any sport, and that umpires should be given more leeway when making decisions.
Regardless of which side of the debate you are on, one thing is certain: the 2019 AFL Grand Final will be remembered for its controversial finish. The debate over umpiring decisions will no doubt continue for some time, and it is likely that this incident will be used as an example of why umpires should be held to a higher standard.
