Spanish football vocabulary has a great word, resultadista, which criticises those whose conclusions stem purely from the result of a match rather than a wider view of the performance or ideas of a particular team, player or coach. So while Real Madrid were stronger, quicker and more clever than Barcelona during Sunday’s 3-1 win in El Clasico (stream a replay on ESPN+) and unquestionably deserved their win, it is arguable that reaction to how Xavi’s team performed in several key aspects has been … resultadista.
Barcelona’s defeat has repeatedly been described as “soulless” and “gray,” with only two positive points: defender Jules Kounde‘s return from injury and the impact of the substitutes. Generally, there has been the rumbling sound of people gearing up to suggest that Xavi isn’t the right man for this job. However, with no wish to be controversial for the sake of it, much of the Barcelona’s work in this defeat was significantly better, clearer, more organised and interesting than anything they’ve done since the thrilling display against Bayern Munich in Germany one month and six matches ago.
The flaws — player laziness, player errors, lack of a clinical pass or finish in the final third — were there, should never be ignored nor underestimated. But nor should they erase the improvement. Watching the match I was sure of it, watching it for the second time it was still clearer and the stats support the argument.
– Stream on ESPN+: LaLiga, Bundesliga, MLS, more (U.S.)
Barcelona were on the ball nearly 10 full minutes more than Madrid and used that to make more than twice the number of passes in their attacking third (147) than Los Blancos (73). In other words it wasn’t sterile, “shuffling the ball about” possession … there was threat.
Barcelona had 18 efforts at goal, more of which (5) were on target than Madrid. The losing team had more passing accuracy, ran further, won the ball back more often in total than their rivals, and also won the ball back in under five seconds far more than Madrid.
Hold on, just in case you’ve lost the thread, this is for the hard of memory, the hard of understanding and the die-hard Madridistas who think that because I’m arguing about the quality of Barcelona’s play in defeat that somehow implies something detrimental about the Spanish and European champions. It doesn’t.
Once more for the record: Carlo Ancelotti’s Madrid team had a game plan, executed it very well, produced superb power plays when it counted, are currently much more street smart than their Clasico rivals and, crucially, made far fewer errors. The better team won.
But, in recent weeks, there’s been jubilation about things like Barcelona moving back to the top of LaLiga for the first time in a couple of years, about the “value” of winning (against Mallorca and Celta) while playing poorly, and that jubilation was used to ignore the truth that the Blaugrana have often looked ordinary, lacking in cohesion and should have conceded more often.
Against Madrid, Barca did things like reducing Vinicius Jr. to only 20 involvements in the match — normally he’s on the ball 52 times per LaLiga game this season. In all, 79% of the champions’ possession was in their own half, they were slower in high intensity sprints than Barcelona and made dramatically fewer of them too.